Skip to main content

Alternatives to Institutional Learning.


I was sitting in my accreditation course last week with a room full of Saskatchewan teachers, some of whom still consider Wikipedia to be the devil and many who think Facebook inherently evil. During one discussion, the idea of changing methods of education afforded by evolving technology was introduced. After some debate, the idea that online and blended learning could mean the death of schools as we know them arose. One of my colleagues offered up the notion of schools without sports teams or cafeterias, where students come and go on radically different schedules. This brought up the well-documented ‘fear of change’ response from many in the room. Perhaps ‘fear for our jobs’ was more likely.
     I was immediately reminded of John Taylor Gatto and his works Dumbing Us Down The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling and The Underground History of American Education where he ties learning systems to the industrial revolution. Just as industry has spread from its assembly line model, so should education. I strongly believe that technology (both systems and hard/software) offers an opportunity to present more choices to more learners and a way out of the one size fits all system that clearly is not working for many.
In my blog I would like to chart some of the options as (I hope) we begin to move towards more individualized learning. Here in Saskatoon, the Media School, the Outdoor School and various online programs like Credenda already exist. My question is - What are the other options? The next question, and one I will probably not deal with this summer, is - How do we implement them? And, why do more not exist already?

Comments

  1. This is a great topic, Stephen, and I do hope you can find a little space in each post to talk a wee bit about implementation of each alternative.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Charter schools and Khan - Don't we need both?

In true hypocrite fashion I am beginning this analysis by looking at a couple of programs in the U.S..  Despite years of ranting about the inability of Canadians to consider models outside of North America, and our insistent comparisons to alternatives south of the border, even when models are clearly inferior to our own or others is infuriating.  I will begin here, but promise to cast a broader net moving forward. I have been curious about Charter schools for a long time, particularly because they offer the promise of diversity.  Charter schools are an opportunity within public education to offer something different from the current replicated model.  They offer hope for variation, experimentation and an opportunity to put into practise some of the theoretical ambitions that are so often constrained by the regulations of traditional structures. A couple of interesting quotations about Charter schools in the U.S. that I feel are worth exploring. "Charter schools offer a way to emb

Harvard for Everyone?

Remember this guy?   His assertions garnered a deluge of responses - many countering his claims that post-secondary schooling was getting in the way of his education. Perhaps Dan Brown should have a look at the University of the People, a tuition-free online University.        Harnessing multiple pedagogical models, UoPeople changes the way        in which education can be accessed. We utilize open source technology      and open educational resources to provide access to educational material      from some of the most prominent institutions. Distance learning allows those      in all corners of the world to access information.( HuffingtonPost ) University of the People believes that online learning is the way to offer access to higher education for millions of people in developing nations. They believe that education can build a road away from poverty and oppression. There is an ‘application fee’ and an ‘exam fee’ each of which cost between $10 and $100 each depending on

Choice: Is it Worth it?

The Ideology of choice, on which capitalism is structured, prevents social change. So, is my advocation of multiple systems for learning simply an ingrained capitalist desire for choice?  And, by doing so am I undermining the stability of the current system that offers little choice?   And, does the current system, by offering little to no choice help alleviate anxiety in youth? According to Professor Selecl, Choice creates anxiety in the three ways: 1) We choose what other people are choosing If I simplify Prof Selecl's argument I can see that students, due to peer pressure, elevated need for belonging etc, almost always choose what the other students are choosing.  Peer pressure in teens is well documented and perhaps if given the opportunity to choose a learning system, students would end up not in the system that suits their educational needs, but the one that their friends are in.  This would most likely lead to a student body as anxious as the one we already h